The importance of language etiquette when it comes to kids -
especially other people's kids!
Being
a writer and copyeditor, I'm prone to nitpicking when it comes to
the written word. It's not just in my job description, it is
my job description. I'm usually pretty relaxed when it comes to
spoken language, as we don't have time to edit ourselves when we
speak. (There is, though, a list of expressions that drive me nuts.
I have always hated being told to "Have a good one" and to have "no
worries" after I thank someone, and short forms of any word make me
cringe. I don't even eat "veggies;" they are "vegetables" to me.
Yep, I'm a bit sensitive to language.)
Once you have a baby, a whole new world opens up to you, and I
discovered that a new world of language habits, many of them
unconscious I think, come along with it. First of all, my daughter's
name is Natasha. I do not know anyone named "Nat" or "Natty," which
people started to call her before she was even born. While she is
welcome to call herself whatever she wants when she is older, I do
not encourage or condone the use of this nickname. As another mom
said about her daughter's name being nick-ed, "Why would you ruin a
perfectly dignified name by changing it like that?"
Next is a strange thing that I noticed as soon as people started
meeting Natasha back when she was a newborn. I was always asked, "Is
she good?" The first time I was asked this, I was taken off guard
and replied yes without having time to really think about it. I know
that the questions means, "Does she cry much?" but it is such a
terrible way to phrase it and just a horrible question to ask. One
elderly woman asked me this when she saw me with Natasha on the
sidewalk. I had decided to just say yes to this question when it is
asked rather than point out the semantic implications of it.
Fortunately, her husband did it for me. He said that all babies are
good. I was so glad to hear him say it, especially coming from a man
in his 70s.
The question and the phrasing implies that your baby might not be
"good." I sometimes wondered how people expected me to answer this
question. What would happen if I said, "No, not really. She's a
pretty bad baby..." But then I found myself tempted to use the same
language, saying that she was "really good" when she went through
some experience and handled it well and did not cry or get upset
when I thought that she might. It shows how embedded certain
cultural expectations and phrasing are in our psyches.
Another thing that surprised me when we were introducing Natasha to
people for the first time was that they asked each other if they
should start telling us teenager horror stories or told us (and
still do now that she is almost 2), "Just wait until she's a
teenager." First of all, I think I'll wait to think about the
teenage years until I can stop using fractions of years when telling
people her age.
Second of all, teenagers are not, by definition, evil, disobedient,
trouble or scary. You'd think that these people were raising drug
addicted, alcoholic criminals to hear them talk about their kids.
The teenaged daughters and sons who I know of these friends are
fine, polite, law abiding, good-grade-attaining individuals who
really don't deserve the discredit and imprinting their parents are
giving them.
And I don't really want Natasha to grow up hearing about "when she's
a teenager" as if she is going to magically change when she hits 13
and be this "other" being that is not who she is now. I don't want
to give the mythology of teenage-hood any more fuel than it already
has through stereotypes and silly movie or TV characters. I don't
want to put any expectations on her or on myself and how our lives
will change on a specific date of her life. Especially when what she
is hearing is negative.
Being aware of these kinds of things when people talk to or about my
child, I try to be aware of how I talk to and about other people's
wee ones. I ask if a new baby is "easy or fussy", fussy being the
new term for "colicky" (read Harvey Karp's book The Happiest Baby
on the Block for a lengthy explanation of this change and
debunking of the myth of colic) and try not to comment on how the
fist year "goes so fast" (remember how many times you heard this and
how trite it becomes?).
And when talking about behaviour or personality traits in kids that
we adults find challenging, I try to be particular and specific
about what word I use. No one really wants people calling their
child "challenging" or "difficult." If you stop yourself from using
words with negative connotations, you force yourself to see beyond
the immediate and really think about what the behaviour is saying
about this individual. So someone who is not "easy" or mellow, I
have realized is "intense" and "sensitive." We see children who are
strong willed and determined and who can butt heads with adults
without backing down. Once we start re-labelling what we name kids
and rephrase our projections or observations, we not only treat them
with more respect and dignity, we also reframe the traits as those
that are easier to identify with and it becomes easier to see into
the future and imagine how this strong willed, no-holding-back 2
year old will grow up to be a great leader and even parent.
So next time you meet a new baby or want to comment on a child you
see at the playground, make sure you think about what you say,
choose your words wisely, and keep in mind that these guys are just
kids. Cut them (and their parents) some slack, but also grant them
the same amount of respect when talking about them that you would an
adult.